• timothyagriswold

The Uniform Child Custody, Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) - California Form FL-105 / GC-1

Updated: Jun 19, 2019


The Uniform Child Custody and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) is an issue that all parents of minor children will encounter when divorcing. In California, divorce petitioners with minor children must FL-105/GC-120 when child custody is at issue involving their divorce.

The Basics of the UCCJEA

The UCCJEA is a uniform act adopted by all the states (with the exception of Massachusetts), the District of Columbia, Guam, and the Virgin Islands. It also requires state courts to enforce child custody and visitation determinations made in a foreign country where the foreign court substantially conforms with the UCCJEA's jurisdictional standards. These standards primarily require fundamental procedural due process, which is mandated by the United States Constitution: procedural due process primarily requires notice and the opportunity to be heard (Read More About How to Get a Custody Order from A Foreign Country Recognized and Enforced).

The UCCJEA has two major purposes: 1) to provide a uniform standard among the states and foreign countries to prevent confusing, inconsistent orders, and inconvenient forums; and 2) to provide a remedial process to enforce interstate child custody and visitation determinations. In effect it prevents parents from "forum shopping" when dealing with child custody disputes.

The court must focus on the following two primary issues under the UCCJEA when presented with a child custody dispute: 1) does the state in which they are residing have initial jurisdiction; or, if not 2) whether the circumstances grant the current state jurisdiction to modify orders from another state.

Initial Jurisdiction under the UCCJEA

To establish initial jurisdiction so a court may make orders regarding child custody disputes, generally one of the following four conditions must be met: 1) a state must be a child’s “home state;" 2) the child and at least one parent must have “a significant connection” with the state (which applies only if there is no "home state;" 3) there is no other more appropriate forum (a state that is not the home state can be found to be more appropriate than the home state under certain circumstances); or 4) a jurisdictional "vacuum" must exist, with no other state would have jurisdiction to decide the case or a state that does have jurisdiction has expressly declined to exercise it.

The UCCJEA defines the home state as “the state in which a child lived with a parent or a person acting as a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately before the commencement of a child custody proceeding.” UCCJEA, §102(7). Home state jurisdiction also exists in a state that was the child’s home state within six months before the filing of the custody case, provided a parent continues to live in that previous home state. Often called the “extended home state rule,” this applies in domestic violence cases when a victim flees with the children to a new state, giving a court in the previous state jurisdiction to hear a custody case filed within six months of the child’s move.

In the case of a child who is less than six months of age at the time of filing, the statute defines the home state as “the state in which the child lived from birth.” Id. If the family has left and then returned to a state, the judge in this state may need to determine whether the time away was a “temporary absence” under the UCCJEA. If the time period is deemed to be a temporary absence, it is included in the calculation of the requisite six-month period for home state jurisdiction.

Modification Jurisdiction under the UCCJEA

The court that originally issues a custody order retains continuing exclusive jurisdiction over any modifications of that order. UCCJEA, §202. A court in a different state, however, may modify the order under any one of the following four circumstances:

1. Upon a finding by the initial or new court that all of the parties have left the issuing state;

2. Upon a finding by the initial court that the parties no longer have a significant connection with the state and that substantial evidence is no longer available there;

3. Upon a decision by the initial court to decline to exercise jurisdiction in favor of another state; or

4. Upon a finding by the new court that it has grounds to exercise temporary emergency jurisdiction.

Temporary Emergency Jurisdiction

Under the UCCJEA, a court may exercise temporary emergency jurisdiction when “the child has been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because the child or a sibling or parent of the child is subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse.” UCCJEA, §204.

The provision clarifies that a court may exercise temporary emergency jurisdiction when a parent (or sibling) of a child has been abused or threatened with abuse, even if the child herself or himself has not been abused. Consequently, a court can exercise this form of jurisdiction when there is evidence that the parent has been abused by the other parent without requiring a finding that there is any child mistreatment or abuse. To exercise emergency jurisdiction, however, a court must find that the child is present in the state.

A court may exercise temporary emergency jurisdiction by entering a domestic violence protection order that includes a custody provision (or through another procedural vehicle).

The UCCJEA specifies that emergency jurisdiction is temporary; it is available to protect the parties until a court in the state with preferred jurisdiction is aware of the emergency and in a position to issue an order or to decline jurisdiction in favor of another state.

In limited circumstances, however, it can become permanent if the order so states, provided a child custody proceeding has not been commenced in another state with jurisdiction and the state becomes the child’s home state.

Reasons Courts with Initial or Modification Custody May Decline to Enter New or Modify Existing Order

Inconvenient Forum

A court having jurisdiction under one of the four jurisdictional bases described above may decline to exercise jurisdiction if the court finds that it is an inconvenient forum and a court in another state is a more appropriate forum. UCCJEA, §207.

By Reason of Conduct (“Unclean Hands”)

A court must decline to exercise jurisdiction if a party has engaged in unjustifiable misconduct that resulted in the court’s jurisdiction over the case. UCCJEA, §208.

This provision authorizes courts to decline to exercise jurisdiction when domestic violence perpetrators have abducted the children, creating custody jurisdiction in a new state. UCCJEA commentary specifies, however, that “domestic violence victims should not be charged with unjustifiable conduct for conduct that occurred in the process of fleeing domestic violence, even if their conduct is technically illegal.” UCCJEA Commentary, §208.

Enforcing the UCCJEA

The UCCJEA establishes enforcement provisions for child custody orders across state and international lines to help ensure the safety of the parties and child. Specifically, Article 3 of the UCCJEA establishes a duty to enforce out-of-state orders in substantial conformity with the statute, sets forth an optional process for registration of out-of-state orders to facilitate enforcement, provides for expedited enforcement of orders in emergencies, authorizes courts to enter warrants for law enforcement to take physical custody of children, and includes additional enforcement provisions.

International Orders

Courts are required to treat foreign countries as if they were states and apply the UCCJEA unless the child custody law of the country “violates fundamental principles of human rights.” UCCJEA, §105.

Tribal Court Orders

If a state has enacted the optional UCCJEA provision regarding tribes (as most have), states must treat tribal court orders as if they were entered by another state. UCCJEA, §104. Because tribes are sovereign nations, however, each tribe has its own child custody jurisdiction law.

To read more about the UCCJEA from a judge's perspective see (https://www.ncjfcj.org/UCCJEA-Guide), where much of the content of this article was taken.

As one can readily see based on the above discussion, the UCCJEA can get tricky. If you have any questions or need help navigating an issue related to UCCJEA and child custody, Contact Griswold Law Firm, for your south bay divorce or child custody issue!

Disclaimer

The content of this website is for informational purposes only. Nothing in this website is intended as a source of legal advice or a representation as to results that may be achieved on any matter. Thus, you should not rely on any information provided herein for legal advice or for any purpose without seeking legal advice from a duly-licensed attorney competent to practice law in your jurisdiction. Please understand, the law constantly changes and evolves; statutes are revised and rewritten; and more recent cases qualify or change existing law. We are unable to update all the information on this website in real-time to reflect these changes, and therefore what we write may not accurately reflect the current state of applicable law by the time you arrive on our site. Moreover, our tips and conclusions are simply a matter of our opinions. These are good reasons why you need to undertake your own due diligence, and investigation, before quoting anything on our website(s) or relying upon it when making your own personal decisions.

Griswold Law Firm makes no warranties or representations of any kind concerning any information made available on or through this website. The content of this website is provided only as general information and may not reflect the most current legal developments. Griswold Law Firm expressly disclaims all liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based upon such information or with respect to any errors or omissions in such information. Griswold Law Firm assumes no liability for the use or interpretation of information contained herein. This publication is provided "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. Moreover, every person's case or legal situation is unique and legal outcomes therefore vary; general legal principles may or may not apply to your circumstances. Seek assistance from a qualified legal professional!


7 views

Recent Posts

See All

Common Law Marriage in California

Common Law Marriage Although most people have heard the term common law marriage, many may not know what is required to enter into such marriages. Only a minority of the states recognize common law ma

Griswold Law Firm offers services in civil litigation and family law in and around the Austin, Texas area, such as Bee Cave, Round Rock, Cedar Park, Plugerville, Cedar Park, etc. as well as the general areas of Travis County and Williamson County.  He also handles big cases in Alameda, Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties in California, for which he collaborates with a local attorney

FOLLOW US:

  • Facebook App Icon
  • LinkedIn App Icon

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The information appearing on this site is not intended to create, and viewing of this information does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.  You should not rely on this information without seeking the advice of an attorney.

 

Note further, an attorney-client relationship shall only be formed by entering into an attorney-client retainer agreement with an attorney from our firm.  Sending email to or calling Griswold Law Firm does not in itself constitute the creation of an attorney client relationship.

 

© 2014 Griswold Law.  All Rights Reserved

 

 

 

Contact Griswold Law Today: Phone (408) 893-5617| Fax (408) 550-1893 |Email tim@griswoldlawfirm.com 

2101 Cochise Trail, Austin, Texas, 78733